The following is a brief description of EGO’s and Kobalt’s current manufacturing practices. For this reason, we have outlined such practices, as they pertain to EGO and Kobalt, allowing consumers to make an even more informed purchasing decision, than would have otherwise been possible. Many consumers still place great importance on a given company’s manufacturing practices. Read Also: Kobalt vs Ridgid Tools Manufacturing It’ll be interesting to see how this plays out as both brands target the similar consumer and are in a similar price range. The brands EGO and SKIL also have their power tools made by Chervon.Ĭraftsman tools, ironically, have also become a fixture of Lowe’s product lines, directly competing with each other in the same store. Chervon Tools is a Chinese company that produces the majority of these products. Kobalt has its own line of battery-operated power tools, which are very popular with the DIY crowd. Products has taken over production of almost all Kobalt hand tools except for the brand’s screwdrivers, which are now made by Great Neck. Several suppliers have taken over manufacturing of Kobalt’s various product lines. Danaher continued to make tools for Kobalt until 2011. The company was based in Washington, D.C., and produced tools for other well-known tool companies like Matco. Williams by Snap-On, the Danaher Corporation took over tool production for Lowe’s. Williams became a member of the Snap-On group.Īfter the purchase of J.H. This collaboration continued until 2002, when J.H. Williams with an offer to create the house line of tools under a partnership. Williams Manufacturing, which had been in operation for over 100 years, manufactured Kobalt tools for the first few years. Lowe’s home improvement stores wanted to establish a house brand in 1998 to compete against Home Depot (Husky) and Sears (Craftsman). Kobalt is a relative newcomer to the field of tool producers when compared to most other brands. See Also: EGO vs Ryobi Tools About Kobalt Tools EGO has also made a habit out of expanding its product line with regular frequency. This is a sector of the market in which EGO has routinely thrived, producing a number of award-winning products. Since the company’s inception, EGO’s focus has been on the production of a sustainable line of battery-powered lawn care and outdoor-specific power equipment. To say the least, consumers responded positively to EGO’s new, job-specific product lineup, as year-one sales outpaced initial projections. This was followed by the brand’s launch within the European market sector in 2014. In a bid to capture a share of this market, Chervon introduced the EGO brand.ĮGO Power+ initially debuted in 2012, within the American market. Leadership within the company felt that consumers would appreciate a battery-powered alternative to traditional gasoline-powered lawn equipment. The “EGO” brand grew out of Chervon’s desire to fulfill a perceived need within the power tool market. Chervon, itself, would go on to serve as a mainstay of the power tool manufacturing scene a role in which it still fulfills today. The brand’s history dates back to 1993, at which time EGO’s parent company, Chervon was founded. About EGO ToolsĮGO is a relative newcomer to the world of portable power tool technology, though the company has more than made up for lost time since its launch. The following is a brief history of both EGO and Kobalt’s rise to prominence within the world of power tools. Even though Kobalt’s history dates back further than EGO’s, each of these manufacturers have proven they can produce nothing but the most premium of products. We hope that this helps you, the consumer, make a more educated purchasing decision, thereby investing your money wisely.ĮGO and Kobalt have both shown many successes in recent years. To assist in this matter, we have assembled the following guide, which compares EGO and Kobalt in a side-by-side fashion, based upon a wealth of valuable criteria. This task becomes especially difficult when comparing two of the power tool industry’s newest brands, EGO and Kobalt, both of which are much younger than many of the market’s mainstay brands. Nonetheless this is not always an easy proposition itself. Many are left with a certain degree of confusion, when attempting to determine how best to spend their money.įor this reason, individuals often compare particular brands to one another, in hopes of proving one to be superior. However, there is also a minor down-side to this as well. Luckily for consumers, this presents a wide array of options to choose from, when selecting which particular tool to purchase. The worldwide tool industry continues to grow quite rampantly, showing few signs of slowing in its expansion any time soon.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |